Antidiabetic Potential
of Erythrina indica
in STZ Induced Rats
Benito
Johnson1*, Roja rani.
A2, P. Ajay Kumar3, Nehru Sai
Suresh Chalichem1, Ashokkumar Javvadi1
1Dept. of pharmacology, RVS college of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Coimbatore
2Dept. of Genetics, Osmania University,
Hyderabad
ABSTRACT:
Diabetes mellitus is a complex metabolic disorder resulting from either
insulin insufficiency or insulin dysfunction. Diabetes screening is recommended
for many people at various stages of life, and for those with any of several risk
factors. The screening test varies according to circumstances and local policy,
and may be a random blood glucose test, a fasting blood glucose test, a blood
glucose test two hours after 75 g of glucose, or an even more formal glucose tolerance
test. Medicinal plants, since time immemorial, have been used in
virtually all cultures as a source of medicine. It has been estimated that
about 80-85% of population both in developed and developing countries rely on
traditional medicine for their primarily health care needs and it is assumed
that a major part of traditional therapy involves the use of plant extracts or
their active principles. The present study was carried out withmethanollic
extract of Erythrina indica
bark at three different dose levels (100, 250, 500mg/kg), through oral
administration. Streptozocin(STZ) was used to induce hyperglycaemia at a dose of 50mg/kg
body weight and Glibenclamide used ad standard drug.
The results of blood glucose level and body weight indicate that extract has
dose dependent beneficial effect. Statistically results were analysed with one
way ANOVA and values are expressed as Mean±SD, P-value
of 0.05 or less was taken as significant
KEYWORDS: Erythrinaindica, Streptozocin, Glibenclamide,
Diabete.
INTRODUCTION:
“Diabetes is a chronic disorder of
carbohydrate, fat and protein metabolism characterized by increased fasting and
post prandial blood sugar levels”.
Type I diabetes (insulin dependent)
is caused due to insulin insufficiency because of lack of functional beta cells.
Patients suffering from this are therefore totally dependent on exogenous
source of insulin while patients suffering from Type II diabetes (insulin
independent) are unable to respond to insulin and can be treated with dietary
changes, exercise and medication. Type II diabetes is the more common form of
diabetes constituting 90% of the diabetic population1.
Pathophysiology of Diabetes mellitus:
The pancreas plays an important
role in the metabolism of glucose by secreting the hormones insulin and
glucagon. The islets of Langerhans secrete insulin
and glucagon directly into the blood. Insulin is a protein that is essential
for proper regulation of glucose and for maintenance of proper blood glucose
levels2.
Glucagon is a hormone that opposes
the action of insulin. It is secreted when blood glucose level falls. It
increases blood glucose concentration partly by breaking down stored glycogen
in the liver by a pathway known as glycogenolysis. Gluconeogenesis is the production of glucose in the liver
from non-carbohydrate precursors such as glycogenic amino acids.
Insulin resistance means that body cells do not respond
appropriately when insulin is present. Unlike type 1 diabetes mellitus, insulin
resistance is generally "post-receptor", meaning it is a problem with
the cells that respond to insulin rather than a problem with the production of
insulin3.
Types of diabetes
mellitus:4
Type 1
diabetes
Type 2
diabetes
Gestational
diabetes
Other types
Type 1 Diabetes:
Type 1 diabetes
mellitus is characterized by loss of the insulin-producing beta cells of
the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas leading to
insulin deficiency. This type of diabetes can be further classified as
immune-mediated or idiopathic. The majority of type 1 diabetes is of the
immune-mediated nature, where beta cell loss is a T-cell mediated autoimmune attack. There
is no known preventive measure against type 1 diabetes. Sensitivity and
responsiveness to insulin are usually normal, especially in the early stages.
Type 1 diabetes can affect children or adults but was traditionally termed
“juvenile diabetes” because it represents a majority of the diabetes cases in
children.
Type 2 Diabetes:
Type 2
diabetes mellitus is characterized by insulin resistance, which may be
combined with relatively reduced insulin secretion. The defective
responsiveness of body tissues to insulin is believed to involve
the insulin receptor. Type 2 diabetes is the most common type.
In the early stage
of type 2 diabetes, the predominant abnormality is reduced insulin
sensitivity. At this stage, hyperglycaemia can be reversed by a variety of
measures and medications that improve insulin sensitivity or reduce
glucose production by the liver. As the disease progresses, the impairment
of insulin secretion occurs, and therapeutic replacement of insulin may
sometimes become necessary in certain patients.
Gestational Diabetes:
Gestational
diabetes mellitus (GDM) resembles type 2 diabetes in several respects,
involving a combination of relatively inadequate insulin secretion and
responsiveness. It occurs in about 2–5% of all pregnancies and may improve
or disappear after delivery. Gestational diabetes is fully treatable but
requires careful medical supervision throughout the pregnancy. About 20–50% of
affected women develop type 2 diabetes later in life.
Even though it may
be transient, untreated gestational diabetes can damage the health of the fetus or mother. Risks to the baby include
macrosomia (high birth weight), congenital cardiac and central nervous
system anomalies, and skeletal muscle malformations. Increased fetal insulin may inhibit fetal surfactant production
and cause respiratory distress syndrome. Hyperbilirubinemia may
result from red blood cell destruction. In severe cases, perinatal
death may occur, most commonly as a result of poor placental perfusion due to
vascular impairment.
Other Types:
Pre-diabetes indicates a condition that occurs when a person’s blood glucose levels are higher than normal but not high enough for a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Many people destined to develop type 2 diabetes, spend many years in a state of pre-diabetes. Some cases of diabetes are caused by the body’s tissue receptors not responding to insulin (even when insulin levels are normal, which is what separates it from type 2 diabetes); this form is very uncommon. Genetic mutations (autosomal
or mitochondrial) can lead to defects in beta cell function. Abnormal insulin action may also have been genetically determined in some cases. Any disease that causes extensive damage to the pancreas may lead to diabetes (for example, chronic pancreatitis and cystic fibrosis). Diseases associated with excessive secretion of insulin-antagonistic hormones can cause diabetes (which is typically resolved once the hormone excess is removed). Many drugs impair insulin secretion and some toxins damage pancreatic beta cells.Causes:
1. Life style5
2. Medical condition6
3. Genetics7
WHO Diabetes
criteria
Diabetes mellitus
is characterized by recurrent or persistent hyperglycemia, and is diagnosed by
demonstrating any one of the following:
·
Fasting
plasma glucose level at or above 7.0 mmol / L
(126 mg/dL).
·
Plasma glucose at or above 11.1 mmol/L
(200 mg/dL) two hours after a 75 g oral
glucose load as in a glucose tolerance test.
·
Symptoms
of hyperglycemia and casual plasma glucose at or above 11.1 mmol /L (200 mg/dL).
·
Glycated
hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1C) at or above 6.5. (This criterion was
recommended by the American Diabetes Association in 2010; it has yet
to be adopted by the WHO.)
DRUGS:
·
Thiazolidinedione (TZDs).
These increase tissue insulin sensitivity by affecting gene expression
·
α-glucosidase inhibitors, which interfere
with absorption of some glucose containing nutrients, reducing (or at least
slowing) the amount of glucose absorbed
·
Meglitinides which stimulate insulin release
quickly; they can be taken with food, unlike the sulfonylureas
which must be taken prior to food (sometimes some hours before, depending on
the drug)
·
Peptide analogs
which work in a variety of ways:
o Incretinmimetics which
increase insulin output from the beta cells among other effects. These includes
the Glucagon-like peptide (GLP) analog exenatide, sometimes referred to as lizard spit
as it was first identified in Gila monster saliva
o Dipeptidyl peptidase-4
(DPP-4) inhibitors increase Incretin levels (sitagliptin) by decreasing
their deactivation rates
o Amylin agonist
analog, which slows gastric emptying and suppresses
glucagon (pramlintide)
Management:
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease which is
difficult to cure. Management concentrates on keeping blood sugar levels as
close to normal (“euglycemia”) as possible without
presenting undue patient danger. This can usually be with close dietary
management, exercise, and use of appropriate medications (insulin only in the
case of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Oral medications may be used in the case of
type 2 diabetes, as well as insulin).
There are roles for patient education, dietetic support, sensible
exercise, with the goal of keeping both short-term and long-term blood glucose
levels within acceptable bounds In addition, given the associated higher
risks of cardiovascular disease, lifestyle modifications are recommended to
control blood pressure in patients with hypertension, cholesterol in those
with dyslipidemia, as well as exercising more,
smoking less or ideally not at all, consuming a
recommended diet. Patients with foot problems are also recommended to wear
diabetic socks, and possibly diabetic shoes.
Anti oxidant
activity:
Though pathophysiology of diabetes remains to be fully understood,
experimental evidences suggest the involvement of free radicals in the
pathogenesis of diabetes and more importantly in the development of diabetic
complications8. Free radicals are capable of damaging cellular
molecules, DNA, proteins and lipids leading to altered cellular functions. Many
recent studies reveal that antioxidants capable of neutralizing free radicals
are effective in preventing experimentally induced diabetes in animal models as
well as reducing the severity of diabetic complications9.
For the development
of diabetic complications, the abnormalities produced in lipids and proteins
are the major etiologic factors. In diabetic patients, extra-cellular and long
lived proteins, such as elastin, laminin
and collagen are the major targets of free radicals. These proteins are modified
to form glyco-proteins due to hyperglycaemia. The
modification of these proteins present in tissues such as lens, vascular wall
and basement membranes are associated with the development of complications of
diabetes such as cataracts, microangiopathy,
atherosclerosis and nephropathy10. During diabetes, lipo- proteins are oxidized by free radicals.
Cytochrome P450
(CYP) enzymes participate in the detoxification of xenobiotics.
Paradoxically, they can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can damage DNA,
as well as lipids and proteins. Metabolism of xenobiotics
leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which leads to
oxidative stress.
Many literatures have
reported that, chronic oxidative stress is one of the important causes for the production
of auto antibodies which leads to autoimmune diseases11.
Lipid peroxidation in fats and fatty foods not only deteriorates
their quality and brings about chemical spoilage, but also generates free radicals
and reactive oxygen species which (ROS) are implicated in carcinogenesis, mutagenesis,
inflammation, aging and cardiovascular diseases. ROS, which include free radicals
such as superoxide anion radicals (O2 - ), hydroxyl radicals (OH.) and
non free radical species such as H2O2 and singled oxygen (
1 O2 ), are various forms of activated oxygen12.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
(i) Chemicals
The analytical graded chemicals were used for all the experiments.
(ii) Collection and Authentication
Erythrina indica belonging to family Fabaceae
has been selected for the study. The plant material was collected from Thirumala forest, Chittor district,
Andhra Pradesh, India and authenticated by Dr. Madhava
Chetty, botanist, Sri Venkateshwara
University, Tirupathi. The bark was shade dried and
ground into coarse powder.
(iii) Preparation of Extract
500g of powdered bark of Erythrina
indica was extracted continuously using soxhlet apparatus with methanol for about 48 hours at 30°C.
The extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure using rotary vacuum flash
evaporator to get a constant volume.
(iv) Preliminary Phytochemical Screening
The plant material is subjected to preliminary phytochemical
screening for the detection of various plant constituents.
Evaluation of anti diabetic activity
Drugs:
Streptozotocin (sigma chemicals), Glibenclamide
(local market) were used during the experimental protocol.
Animals:
Healthy male Wistar rats of weighing
about 175 - 200 g purchased from NIN, Hyderabad were used in the present
investigation. All the rats were given a period of acclimatization for 7 days
before starting the experiment. They were fed ad libitum
everyday with standard chow diet and were given free access to water. Animals
described as fasting were deprived of food for at least 18 h but were allowed free
access to drinking water.
Toxicity studies:
The extracts were given at the doses of 100, 250 and 500 mg/kg/day
of body weight. All the animals found to be safe at dose of 3000 mg/kg (as per
OECD Guidelines).
Experimental Induction of diabetes
Streptozotocin was purchased from, Sigma chemicals
Hyderabad, India and was freshly dissolved in 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH = 4.5)
at the dose of 50 mg/kg body weight and injected intraperitoneally
within 15 min of dissolution in a vehicle volume of 0.4 mL
with 1 mL of tuberculin syringe fitted with 24 gauge
needle, whereas normal control group was given citrate buffer only (0.4 mL). Diabetes was confirmed by the determination of fasting
glucose concentration on the third day post administration of Streptozotocin13.
Experimental design:
Rats were divided into the following groups.
Group I:Consists 6
rats which served
as normal control and were given
only citrate buffer (0.4 ml pH 4.5) daily.
Group II:Consists 6 STZ induced diabetic rats and served as
diabetic control and were given citrate buffer (0.4 ml pH 4.5) daily.
Group III:Consists 6 STZ induced diabetic rats and were
treated orally with methanolic extract of Erythrina
indica (MEEI) bark at the dose of 100 mg/kg body weight
daily for 21 days, once a day.
Group IV:Consists 6 STZ induced diabetic rats and were treated
orally with methanolic extract of Erythrina
indica bark at the dose of 250 mg/kg body weight
daily for 21 days, once a day.
Group V:Consists 6 STZ induced diabetic rats and were treated
orally with methanolic extract of Erythrina
indica bark at the dose of 500 mg/kg body weight
daily for 21 days, once a day.
Group VI:Consists 6 STZ induced diabetic rats and were given
Glibenclamide (GBC) at the dose of 10 mg/kg body
weight daily for 21 days, once a day.
Collection and processing of blood for estimation of blood sugar
levels:
After 21 days of herbal treatment experiments were terminated and observations
were made. Body weight was taken before and after experiment with the help of
single pan balance. Blood glucose level was estimated on 0 day 7th,
14th and 21st day of experiment with the help of glucometer using strip method and blood was taken from tip
of the tail.
RESULTS:
Table 1: Phyto chemical screening
|
S.NO. |
TEST |
Methanolic Extract |
|
1 |
Carbohydrates (Benedict’s
test) |
+ |
|
2 |
Proteins (Biuret test) |
+ |
|
3 |
Amino acids (Ninhydrin test) |
+ |
|
4 |
Alkaloids (Mayer’s test) |
+ |
|
5 |
Steroids (Salkowaski’s Test) |
+ |
|
6 |
Phenolic compounds (FeCl3) |
+ |
|
7 |
Tannins |
+ |
|
8 |
Cardiac Glycosides (Kellarkillani
Test) |
+ |
|
9 |
Saponins (Foam Test) |
+ |
DISCUSSION:
Streptozotocin induced hyperglycaemia has been described as a useful
experiment model to study the activity of hypoglycaemic agents14. Streptozotocin selectively destroys the pancreatic insulin
B cells, leaving less active cell resulting in a diabetic state. Streptozotocin action in B cells is accompanied by
characteristic alterations in blood insulin and glucose concentrations. Two
hours after injection, the hyperglycaemia isobserved later
hypoglycaemia occurs15. These changes in blood glucose and reflect abnormalities
in B cell function. STZ impairs glucose oxidation and decreases insulin
biosynthesis and secretion16. It was observed that STZ at first
abolished the B cell response to glucose. Temporary return of responsiveness
then appears which is followed by its permanent loss and cells are damaged17.
In the present study, the
methanolic extract of bark of Erythrina indica (MEEI) produced a significant decrease in the
blood glucose level at a dose level of 250 and 500 mg/kg in hyperglycaemic
rats. The animals which are treated with 500 mg/kg of MEEI showed a significant
decrease in the blood glucose levels when compared to the 250 and 100 mg/kg
MEEI.
The fact that some herbal
preparations enhance the beta cell regeneration and peripheral glucose
utilization in Alloxan18 and Streptozotocin
induced diabetic rats supports the above assumption.
The significant decrease in the
blood glucose levels in diabetic rats treated with bark of MEEI may be by
stimulation of the residual pancreatic mechanism, probably by increasing
peripheral utilization of glucose19.
STZ was found to generate reactive
oxygen species, which also contribute to18diabetogenic action and
plants containing flavonoids, isoflavanoids,
triterpenoids have been
shown to be effective in diabetes due to their antioxidants property20.
This suggest that the antihyperglycemic activity of Erythrina indica may be
due to free radical scavenging activity which enhance the beta cell
regeneration against streptozotocin induced free
radicals.
Table:2 Antidiabetic activity of Erythrina indica
|
Group |
Treatment |
Mean Fasting
blood glucose level (mg/dl) |
|||
|
Basalvalue |
1st week |
2nd week |
3rd week |
||
|
Group I |
Normal Control |
91.83±2.78 |
92.50±4.23 |
90.33±4.08 |
91.50±3.44 |
|
Group II |
Diabetic Control |
291.83±3.30 |
290.16±3.18 |
288.66±4.63 |
291±4.24 |
|
Group III |
EIME 100 mg/kg |
297.66±3.77b |
283.33±3.38b |
270.50±5 b |
258.66±4.22b |
|
Group IV |
EIME 250 mg/kg |
290.16±4.79b |
265.83±3.96b |
260.33±4.36b |
251.83±2.85b |
|
Group V |
EIME500 mg/kg |
295.33±3.66b |
221.66±5.20b |
207±4.27 b |
199.33±5.67b |
|
Group VI |
Standard Glibenclamide
10 mg/kg |
293.66±4.29b |
209.16±3.76b |
183.50±4.96b |
177.33±4.95b |
Values expressed as Mean ± SD;
Number of animals in each group = 6.
P< 0.05*: a, P< 0.001**: b
and P< 0.0001***: c
Table:3 Effect ofErythrina indica on body weight of diabetic animals
|
S.No |
Treatment |
Mean body weight (g) |
|||
|
Initial |
1st week |
2nd week |
3rd week |
||
|
Group I |
Normal Control |
186.33 ± 2.75 |
188.0 ± 2.60 |
191.60 ± 2.89 |
193.90 ± 2.53 |
|
Group II |
Diabetic Control |
187.83 ± 3.30 |
158.33 ± 3.96 |
144.50 ± 4.63 |
132.03 ± 4.24 |
|
Group III |
ME 100 mg/kg |
186.50 ± 3.47 b |
160.08 ± 4.21 b |
149.28 ± 3.91 b |
141.35 ± 3.63 b |
|
Group IV |
ME 250 mg/kg |
188 ± 4.36 b |
181.28 ± 3.66 b |
175.13 ± 5.20 b |
166.21 ± 4.79 b |
|
Group V |
ME500 mg/kg |
193.66 ± 3.76 b |
187.03 ± 4.96 b |
182.48 ± 4.63 b |
173.35 ± 4.24 b |
|
Group VI |
Standard Glibenclamide
10 mg/kg |
189.83 ± 4.29 b |
186.22 ± 3.30 b |
179.53 ± 4.44 b |
176.22 ± 4.67 b |
Values expressed as Mean ± SD;
Number of animals in each group = 6.
P< 0.05*: a, P< 0.001**: b
and P< 0.0001***: c
CONCLUSION:
The literature reports reveal that
flavonoids and tannins present in some plant extracts
are responsible for antidiabetic activity. In the
present investigation also the observed antidiabetic
potential ofMEEI may be due to presence of similar phytoconstituents which was evident by preliminary
phytochemical screening.
Further pharmacological and
biochemical investigations will clearly elucidate the mechanism of action and
will be helpful in projecting this plant as a therapeutic target in diabetes.
REFERENCES:
1. Ramachandran, A., Snehalatha, C., and Viswanathan, V.: Burden of type 2 diabetes and its
complications- the Indian scenario. Curr. Sci., 83, 1471–1476, 2002.
2. Brentjens R, Saltz L (2001). "Islet cell tumors of the pancreas:
the medical oncologist's perspective". SurgClin
North Am 81 (3): 527–42. doi:10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70141-9.
PMID 11459269.
3. Bhattacharya SK, Satyan
KS and Chakrbati A. Effect of Trasina,
an Ayurvedic herbal formulation, on pancreatic islet superoxide dismutase
activity in hyperglycemia rats. Indian J. Exp. Biol. (1997)
35: 297-299.
4. Mbanya JC, Ngogang J, Salah JN, Minkoulou E, Balkau B. Prevalence
of NIDDM and impaired glucose tolerance in a rural and an urban population in
Cameroon. Diabetologia.1997; 40:824-9.
5. Ahuja MMS.
Epidemiology studies on diabetes mellitus in India, Ahuja
MS, (ed). Epidemiology
of diabetes in developing countries. Interprint,
New Delhi, 1979, p 29-38.
6. Cao G, Sofic ER
and Prior RL. Antioxidant capacity of tea and common vegetables.
J. Agric. Food Chem.(1996) 44: 3426-3431.
7. Elgawish, A., Glomb, M., Friendlander, M., and Monnier, V.M.: Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in collagen
cross-linking by high glucose in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem.,271, 12964–12971, 1999.
8. Matteucci, E. and Giampietro, O.: Oxidative stress in families of type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care, 23, 1182–1186, 2000.
9. Lipinski, B.: Pathophysiology
of oxidative stress in diabetes mellitus. J. Diabet. Complications, 15, 203–210, 2001.
10. Glugliano. D., Ceriello, A., and Paolisso, G.: Oxidative
stress and diabetic vascular complications. Diabet.Care, 19, 257–267, 1996.
11. Namazi MR. Neurogenic dysregulation,
oxidative stress, autoimmunity, and melanocytorrhagy
in vitiligo: can they be interconnected? Pigment Cell
Res. 20: 360-363, (2007).
12. (Amarowicz R, Naczk M, Shahidi F (2000). Antioxidant activity of various fractions of non-tannin phenolics of canola hulls. J. Agric. Food.Chem 48: 2755-2759).
13. Ogbonnia SO, Odimegwu JI, Enwuru VN,
Evaluation of hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects of
ethanolic extracts of TreculiaafricanaDecne and Bryophyllumpinnatum Lam. and their mixture on streptozotocin (STZ) - induced diabetic rats, African
Journal of Biotechnology, 7(15)2008, 2535-2539.
14. Szkudelski, T., 2001. The mechanism of alloxan
and streptozotocin action in B cells of the pancreas.
Physiol. Res., 50: 537-546.
15. West E, Simon
OR, Morrison EY: Streptozotocin
alters pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness to glucose within six hours of
injection into rats. West Indian Med J 45: 60-62, 1996.
16. Bolaffi JL, Nagamatsu S, Harris J,
Grodsky GM: Protection by thymidine,
an inhibitor of polyadenosinediphosphateribosylation,
of streptozotocin inhibition of insulin secretion. Endocrinology
120: 2117-2122, 1987.
17. Bedoya FJ, Solano F, Lucas M: N-monomethyl-arginine and nicotinamide prevent streptozotocin-induced
double strand DNA break formation in pancreatic rat islets. Experientia
52: 344-347, 1996.
18. Takasu N, Komiya I, Asawa T, Nagasawa Y, Yamada T: Streptozotocin-
and alloxan-induced H2O2
generation and DNA fragmentation in pancreatic islets. H2O2
as mediator for DNA fragmentation. Diabetes 40:1141-1145, 1991b.
19. Erah, P.O., G.E. O Suide and
E.K.I. Omogbai, 1996. Hypoglycaemic effect of the
extract of Solenostemonmonostachys leaves. J.West Afr. Pharma., 10: 21-27.
20. Jafri MA, Aslam M, Kalim J, Surender S. (2000). Effect of Punicagranatum Linn. (Flowers) on blood glucose level in normal and alloxan-induced
diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol 70: 309–14.
Received on 10.12.2011
Modified on 21.12.2011
Accepted on 01.01.2012
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.
4(2): March-April 2012,
70-74